Cases 1 - 10 of 209
USA v. Billy Hicks, Jr.
as 24-1474
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BILLY L. HICKS, JR.
Hicks v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hicks v. Director of Navos
as 2:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L Hicks
Defendant:
Director of Navos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Vincent Franklin
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Kevin Kauffman and L. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKS v. KUHN et al
as 2:2023cv02709
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L HICKS
Defendant:
ACTING COMMISSIONER VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Commissioner PATRICIA MCGILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Huertas Danner, Jr. et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
Andres Huertas Danner, Jr., Alan A. Chiras, Alejandro Sia and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huertas Danner, Jr. et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Andres Huertas Danner, Jr., Alan A. Chiras, Alejandro Sia and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Matthews and Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Billy Hicks, Jr.
as 23-1098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BILLY L. HICKS, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hicks v. Arkansas Department of Correction
as 4:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Stephen L Hicks
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
