Cases 1 - 10 of 1,733
Leach v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
Katherine Leach
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leach v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00433
Petitioner:
Nicholas J Leach
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason Lewis v. City of Manhattan Beach et al
as 2:2024cv03479
Plaintiff:
Mason Lewis
Defendant:
City of Manhattan Beach, Shawn Thompson, Steve Kitsios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leach v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J Leach
Defendant:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick Leach v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-11251
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J.P. LEACH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Corie Yates v. Cpt. Degeare
as 24-6304
Plaintiff:
CORIE YATES
Defendant:
CPT. DEGEARE, Chief Classification/Monitor Records Branch, MAJOR SHABAZZ, Confinement Division, LT. QUESENBERRY, Classification/Evaluate Inmate Housing Status and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
LEACH-HILTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01382
Plaintiff:
NIKEEM LEACH-HILTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ofray v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2024cv06170
Petitioner:
Jasmine Ofray
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department and RPD Officer Mitchell Leach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
