Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Frisby v. Hahn et al
as 3:2019cv00775
Defendant:
Lee Ferguson, Naomi Campbell, Kathy McAlpine and others
Plaintiff:
Darcy Roy Frisby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Torbenson et al
as 2:2018cv00345
Plaintiff:
Archie Lee Ferguson, III
Defendant:
Matthew J Torbenson , Mark Sanders and State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson et al
as 3:2017cv01260
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Ferguson and Maria Y Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Ferguson et al v. Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation
as 3:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Ferguson and Maria Y Ferguson
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Ferguson et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insuance Company
as 3:2017cv01261
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Ferguson and Maria Y Ferguson
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insuance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Ferguson et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insuance Company
as 3:2017cv01262
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Ferguson and Maria Y Ferguson
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insuance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Ferguson v. Lamb et al
as 4:2014cv00074
Defendant:
Branda Lamb, Don Zickmund, Jason Pritchett and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lee Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilbert Ferguson v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20209
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILBERT LEE FERGUSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ferguson v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv22415
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Ferguson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
