Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Victim Rights Law Center et al v. DeVos et al
as 1:2020cv11104
Defendant:
Elizabeth D. DeVos, U.S. Department of Education, Kenneth L. Marcus and others
Plaintiff:
Legal Voice, Victim Rights Law Center, Equal Rights Advocates and others
Amicus Curiae:
National LGBTQ Task Force, Vera House, Inc., California Women's Law Center and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Independent Women's Law Center, Speech First, Inc., Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cook County, Illinois et al v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2019cv06334
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI II, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, a federal agency and others
Plaintiff:
Cook County, Illinois, an Illinois governmental entity, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Inc. and Cook County, Illinois
Amicus Curiae:
Nevada Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violence, Sexual Violence Law Center, Equip for Equality and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv05210
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II and others
Plaintiff:
State of Colorado, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs, Little Lobbyists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Drew Adams v. School Board of St. Johns Co.
as 18-13592
Amicus Curiae:
WOMEN'S LAW PROJECT, CHAMPION WOMEN, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS and others
Not Classified By Court:
REPLACEMENTS, LTD., TWITTER INC., YELP INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DREW ADAMS, a minor, by and through his next friend and mother, Erica Adams Kasper
Defendant / Appellant:
SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA
Kayla Willis, et al v. City of Seattle, et al
as 17-80214
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
KAYLA WILLIS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, REAVY WASHINGTON, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, LISA HOOPER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals and others
Defendant - Respondent:
CITY OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and ROGAR MILLAR, Secretary of Transportation for WSDOT, in his official capacity
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
DISABILITY RIGHTS WASHINGTON, HOMELESS RIGHTS ADVOCACY PROJECT, NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3207
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3208
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fulcher v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 17-1460
Amicus Curiae:
CITY OF ROCHESTER, NEW YORK, JOCELYN SAMUELS, NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
GIULIANO SILVA, DEE FULCHER and TRANSGENDER AMERICAN VETERANS ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc.
as 15-3775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melissa Zarda, co-independent executors of the estate of Donald Zarda and William Allen Moore, Jr., co-independent executor of the estate of Donald Zarda
Defendant - Appellee:
Altitude Express, Inc., doing business as Skydive Long Island and Ray Maynard
Amicus Curiae:
New York Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union, 9 to 5, National Association of Working Women and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
