Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Hall v. Child Support Enforcement (CSU) et al
as 1:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
Janice R. Hall
Defendant:
Child Support Enforcement (CSU), Lamont Johnson and Judge Freda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nedrick Johnson v. Warden Allenwood FCI Low
as 24-1257
Plaintiff:
NEDRICK LAMONT JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI LOW
Eric Lamont Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv02542
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and James B. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. East Side Auto Transport LLC et al
as 1:2023cv10674
Defendant:
East Side Auto Transport LLC and Nathaniel Taylor Jordan
Plaintiff:
Lamont Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
USA v. Johnson
as 23-11194
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ceddrick Lamont Johnson, also known as Bunny Cool
Johnson v. Thompson
as 3:2023cv01841
Petitioner:
Nedrick Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
LSCI-Allenwood Warden R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Gwinnett County Sheriffs Office/Jail et al
as 1:2023cv05098
Plaintiff:
Emry Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriffs Office/Jail, Gwinnett County Detention Center and Keybo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. James Johnson
as 23-2977
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES LAMONT JOHNSON
Johnson v. Reeves
as 1:2023cv04364
Petitioner:
Paul Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Angela Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaunte Lamont Johnson Sr. v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2023cv01968
Petitioner:
Shaunte Lamont Johnson, Sr.
Respondent:
Ms. Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
