Cases 1 - 10 of 6,552
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Officer Baker and Lance Korando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mosley v. PPH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jerome Lance Mosley
Defendant:
PPH Mortgage Corporation, Dutch Mill MHP LLC, AAMES Funding Corporation, DBA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Locey v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 6:2024cv06277
Plaintiff:
Lance Michael Locey
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Luther v. Chochran et al
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Jayson Lance Luther
Defendant:
Chochran, Dorton and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01922
Plaintiff:
Latoya Shanah Moultrie
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, City of Smyrna Police Department, Officer T. Cooper and others
Semper v. Gadsden Land Bank Association et al
as 4:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Jehan Semper
Defendant:
Gadsden Land Bank Association, Chamberlain Parker, Rod Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANCE-GEIGER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
MARGIE LANCE-GEIGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment
De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, et al.
as 24-2738
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DE BOTTON
Defendant:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, WARREN LANCE and others
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
