Cases 71 - 80 of 2,533
Henderson v. Discovery Card Corporate Office et al
as 4:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Lane Henderson
Defendant:
Discovery Card Corporate Office, Roger C. Hochschild, John T. Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Page v. WellPath et al
as 6:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Page
Defendant:
WellPath, Nurse Brittani Standing, HSA Maegan Quillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Megan Stepansky v. Jimmy Lane
as 23-2162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN STEPANSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
JIMMY LANE, DAVID BOONE, SHARON BALLARD and others
Eisenmann v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02285
Petitioner:
Gary Lane Eisenmann
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Arthur E. Mallory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Dolman et al.
as 5:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
William Lane
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Dolman, Deputy Russ, Deputy Dale Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lance Braham v. Camacho et al
as 1:2023cv24146
Plaintiff:
Lance Braham
Defendant:
W. Gonzalez Camacho, John Doe, Warden Boan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Haynes
as 2:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Edward Lane Hart
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 7:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane-Bey v. Lane T98017 et al
as 1:2023cv12391
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lane-Bey
Defendant:
Alfred Darnell Lane T98017, Maura T. Healy, Shawn P. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
