Cases 1 - 10 of 638
United States of America v. Sealed (Latimer)
as 25-197
Defendant:
COREY LATIMER, RONALD JOHNSON, SAVON BAGBY and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Leak v. King
as 3:2025cv00027
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Leak
Defendant:
Eric King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Pitts v. Shelby County Justice Center, et al
as 2:2024cv02965
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff Office, Sheriff Floyd Bonner, Jr., Sgt (FNU) Buford and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Hawkins v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02901
Defendant:
Detective Fleener, Lt. Leake, State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Donzel Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEAK v. SIX FLAGS AMERICA LP et al
as 2:2024cv09470
Defendant:
SIX FLAGS AMERICA LP, ABC CORPORATION 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
LYESHA LEAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
LEAKE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05038
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEAKE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Leake et al v. Grand Forks County Water Resource District
as 3:2024cv00176
Defendant:
Grand Forks County Water Resource District
Plaintiff:
Todd Leake, Lonnie Leake and Scott Hallgren
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Faytima Howard v. Macomb County, MI
as 24-1665
Defendant:
MACOMB COUNTY, MI
Plaintiff:
FAYTIMA HOWARD, fka Faytima Leak
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.