Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Sharp v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
Lee Sharp
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. Williams et al
as 2:2018cv04362
Plaintiff:
David Lee Sharp
Defendant:
T Williams, Unknow Party, Unknown Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00420
Petitioner:
Thaddeus Lee Sharp
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Spann et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00902
Plaintiff:
Debbie Spann , Edward Benson , Shirley Bonner and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH , Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp #194939 v. McWilliam et al
as 4:2015cv00263
Petitioner:
David Lee Sharp
Respondent:
C McWilliam and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharp #194939 v. Hellon et al
as 2:2015cv01070
Plaintiff:
David Lee Sharp
Defendant:
Toni L Hellon, Leo Marsuski, C McWilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00468
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Simmons , Debbie Barger , Jacqueline Betts and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 5:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
George Lee Sharp
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharp v. Warden et al
as 3:2015cv00118
Respondent:
James Caldwell and Unknown Warden
Petitioner:
George Lee Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as MOE/4:15-cv-00341
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Simmons , Debbie Barger , Jacqueline Betts and others
Defendant:
Skechers USA. Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
