Cases 11 - 20 of 102
Robertson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Robertson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robertson, Robert v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Robertson
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Andre Terial Love v. J. M. Robertson
as 2:2022cv00977
Petitioner:
Andre Terial Love
Respondent:
J M Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Luve et al
as 3:2021cv00347
Plaintiff:
Travis M Robertson
Defendant:
Stoney Luve, Sgt. Katie Wilson, Lt. Mallory Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Clark et al
as 1:2021cv00668
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Bryan Clark and Fran Chardo
Petitioner:
Kashif M. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robertson v. McGowan et al
as 1:2021cv00222
Defendant:
Dan Kinsinger, Bruce Cutter and Chad A. McGowan
Plaintiff:
Kashif M. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Anglemeyer et al
as 1:2020cv01736
Defendant:
Jason Snyder and Richard Anglemeyer
Plaintiff:
Kashif M. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22221
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY M. ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bosen v. Robertson et al
as 1:2020cv10586
Defendant:
Thomas M Robertson and Caroline Robertson
Plaintiff:
Theodore L Bosen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
