Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Arrington v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv01458
Petitioner:
Richard M. Arrington
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THE ESTATE OF JUDITH M. ARRINGTON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv20161
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF JUDITH M. ARRINGTON and BONNIE LEWTON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arrington v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Delaware) et al
as 1:2021cv03322
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Arrington
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Delaware) and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gillette v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2020cv00513
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Colette Peters, Brittney Aldrich and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Gillette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arrington v. Jackson National LIfe Insurance Company et al
as 3:2017cv00472
Defendant:
Danny C Burba and Jackson National Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
William M Arrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ewing v. Jone et al
as 1:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ronnell Ewing
Defendant:
Unknown Jone, Unknown Sanford, Unknown Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Barnes v. Faye Mitchell
as 13-6675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
FAYE W. MITCHELL, Head Clerk, FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF VA, Municipality and M. ARRINGTON, Judge
Barnes v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2013cv00398
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Barnes
Defendant:
Faye W. Mitchell, First Judicial Circuit of VA and M. Arrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARRINGTON v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv70957
Plaintiff:
ROSE M. ARRINGTON
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
