Cases 31 - 40 of 73
TALLEY v. PRESSLEY et al
as 2:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
D. PRESSLEY, M. GIANETTI, LAURA BANTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRINGLE v. NASH et al
as 1:2017cv04148
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW INDIANA, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, WILLIAM M. NASH and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINGLE v. ZOELLER et al
as 1:2017cv02949
Defendant:
KELLY S. BENJAMIN, WILLIAM M. NASH, LYNDA K. ROBISON and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A.R.N.H v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00484
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Erica M. Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nash v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2016cv05052
Plaintiff:
Rose M Nash
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Willie Nash v. Reed Richardson
as 16-1449
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE M. NASH
Respondent - Appellee:
REED A. RICHARDSON
Nash v. Criminal Court for Davidson County Tennesee et al
as 3:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Nash
Defendant:
Criminal Court for Davidson County Tennesee and Criminal Court for Wilson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nash v. Ariens Company et al
as 1:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Nash
Defendant:
Ariens Company , The Home Depot and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nash v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03551
Plaintiff:
Joanne M. Nash
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Wal-Mart Stores East LP , Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tiller v. Nash et al
as 4:2014cv04095
Plaintiff:
Joshua Perry Jones Tiller
Defendant:
M. Nash, W. Walker and J. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
