Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Seeley v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00944
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Raymond Seeley
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Seeley v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2026cv01043
Plaintiff:
Kristina Ann Seeley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Seeley v. Loomis Armored US, LLC
as 1:2026at03214
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Seeley
Defendant:
Loomis Armored US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Seeley v. Loomis Armored US, LLC
as 2:2026cv02865
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Seeley
Defendant:
Loomis Armored US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jones v. Ball et al
as 2:2026cv00179
Plaintiff:
Dorian Jones
Defendant:
Cathy Ball, Laurie Haynes, Thomas J. Seeley, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. State of Connecticut
as 26-1869
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., STATE OF CONNECTICUT, KEVIN GENE DUBAY and others
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE LOIS WASHINGTON and BASIL CLIFTON WASHINGTON
Seeley v. Crews
as 26-1266
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WAYNE SEELEY, III
Defendant:
DEPUTY STEPHEN CREWS, State Official
Martin et al v. 9404 Joliet Wings Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv07693
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martin and Dario Cisneros
Defendant:
9404 Joliet Wings Inc., Hena SDA LLC, Chicago Wings 115 and Kedzie Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SEELEY v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2026cv01186
Defendant:
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Douglas A Seeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Ili et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 3:2026cv05562
Plaintiff:
Talanoa Ili and Charlie Mirer
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association, Atlantic Coast Conference, Big Ten Conference and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
