Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Johnson et al v. Kendall United Methodist Church
as 1:2016cv21563
Defendant:
Kendall United Methodist Church
Plaintiff:
Margaret Johnson and Miles Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Cathey et al
as 5:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Neil Kelly
Defendant:
Diana C. Cathey, Ivory Jones, Estate of Thomas A. Jones, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15281
Plaintiff:
Margaret Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scotino et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2015cv03169
Plaintiff:
Mary Scotino , Sheila Anderson , Ana E Calero and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Margaret Johnson Nichols v. Hope4Cancer Institute LLC et al
as 3:2015cv02358
Plaintiff:
Estate of Margaret Johnson Nichols
Defendant:
Hope4Cancer Institute LLC, Antonio Jimenez and Dewayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
RHODES v. FLEMING et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Respondent:
ZAKI ALI, CINDY BABB, CITY OF KOKOMO and others
Petitioner:
TRACEY RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Scotino et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as MOE/4:15-cv-00540
Plaintiff:
Mary Scotino , Sheila Anderson , Ana E Calero and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Scotino et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Mary Scotino , Sheila Anderson , Ana E Calero and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jensen et al v. EXC Incorporated et al
as 3:2015cv08019
Defendant:
EXC Incorporated, Conlon Garage Incorporated, Go Ahead Vacations Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Jamien Rae Jensen , Chavis Johnson , Margaret Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
