Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Rogers v. 3M Company
as 0:2017cv02351
Plaintiff:
Mary Helen Rogers
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01111
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sterling Bates , Barton Baron , Joseph R. Bork, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR v. ROGERS
as 2:2016mc00327
Petitioner:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Respondent:
MARY E ROGERS
Smoak v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv02800
Plaintiff:
Mary Sallie Rogers Smoak
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROGERS v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00991
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
MARY L. ROGERS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Ransom et al v. San Jacinto Junior College et al
as 4:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kmiya Ransom and Mary Elaine Rogers
Defendant:
San Jacinto Junior College, Brenda Hellyer, Laurel Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ransom et al v. San Jacinto Junior College et al
as 4:2014mc02868
Petitioner:
Kmiya Ransom and Mary Elaine Rogers
Respondent:
San Jacinto Junior College, Brenda Hellyer, Laurel Williamson and others
ROGERS v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01824
Plaintiff:
MARY L. ROGERS
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WAL-MART REALTY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lane et al v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv01688
Plaintiff:
Steven S Lane and Karen L Lane
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Ava Arpaio, Glenn Heine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Rogers et al
as 4:2012cv04029
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Johnson
Defendant:
Anne Paige Rogers, Mary E. Rogers, Kevin Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
