Cases 41 - 50 of 470
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447
Gerson Naun Ramos Benegas v. William P. Barr
as 19-1275
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
GERSON NAUN RAMOS BENEGAS
Diana Jomaa, et al v. USA, et al
as 19-1156
Defendant / Appellee:
KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting U.S. Attorney General, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIANA JOMAA and GEORGINA RIZK
Zhao v. Barr
as 19-398
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Shoulong Zhao
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00642
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdulkadir Mohamed v. William P. Barr
as 19-3116
Petitioner:
ABDULKADIR IBRAHIM MOHAMED
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Josefina Ortiz Corrales v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60099
Petitioner:
JOSEFINA MERARY ORTIZ CORRALES
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, ACTING U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gleason v. Whitaker et al
as 4:2019cv00256
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gleason
Defendant:
Thomas E. Brandon and Matthew G. Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(HC) Ahadpour v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2019cv00215
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker and Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Alidad Alibaba Ahadpour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
