Cases 71 - 80 of 10,692
Francis v. Sandoval
as 1:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Francis
Defendant:
Maurice Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
ATD Business Consulting, Inc. v. BGC Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01537
Defendant:
BGC Solutions LLC, Farm Stores Franchising, LLC, Holstein & Penn LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ATD Business Consulting, Inc. doing business as Franchise Business Source
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Duckett v. Garcia
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
James Maurice Duckett and Jamesha Duckett
Defendant:
P. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maurice et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Paulette S. Maurice and Fergus A. Maurice, Jr.
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
United States of America v. London
as 24-817
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE LONDON
Shuron Barksdale v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6289
Petitioner:
SHURON MAURICE BARKSDALE
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Department of Corrections
Jones v. Linsia et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Dominick Maurice Jones
Defendant:
Unknown Linsia, Unknown Gunwin, Unknown Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08008
Petitioner:
Daymon Maurice Bush
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Payton v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Norbert Maurice Payton
Defendant:
H. Robinson, C. Cabatic, D. Tabbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
