Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ROBINSON v. ROWAN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2016cv00160
Petitioner:
MAURICE ROBINSON
Respondent:
ROWAN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. Isaac Robinson
as 15-4697
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ISAAC MAURICE ROBINSON, a/k/a Ike
ROBINSON v. WALKER et al
as 1:2015cv00941
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHELLE WALKER and BRANDY COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. ROWAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2015cv00838
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ROBINSON
Defendant:
ROWAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, MICHELLE WALKER and BRANDY COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson v. Regional Medical Center at Memphis et al
as 4:2015cv00395
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Regional Medical Center at Memphis, University of Tennessee, Chan Suddin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2015cv00075
Petitioner:
MAURICE ROBINSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rose et al v. Computer Sciences Corporation
as 2:2015cv00813
Plaintiff:
Steve Rose , Kenneth Alford , Paul Beavers and others
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robinson v. Maricopa County Durango Jail et al
as 2:2014cv02187
Plaintiff:
Nathan Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Maricopa County Durango Jail and Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
