Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Davis v. Gubster et al
as 1:2026cv08841
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Brian Davis
Defendant:
Jane Gubster, Thomas Dart, Collins and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13382
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Prete v. Benjamin et al
as 1:2026cv00474
Plaintiff:
Michael Prete
Defendant:
Mark Benjamin, Peter Neronha, Stephen Dambruch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duckett v. William Gladson, et al.
as 5:2026cv00524
Defendant:
James Aren Duckett, Clerk of Court Gary J. Cooney, State Attorney William McDonald Gladson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. O'Donnell et al
as 4:2026cv02032
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Robinson
Defendant:
Michael O'Donnell, Kevin O'Hearn, Judge Rosini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thornhill v. Dart et al
as 1:2026cv08657
Plaintiff:
Domonique Michelle Thornhill
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Officer McDonald, Unknown Cook County Sheriff Deputies (John Does 1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDONALD v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv01029
Petitioner:
FRANCIS MCDONALD
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13322
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Mcdonald v. Arc Games Inc et al
as 1:2026cv08623
Plaintiff:
Sade Mcdonald
Defendant:
Arc Games Inc and Perfect World Games
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
