Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Store Chain, Inc. v. Gilbert et al
as 4:2022cv00938
Plaintiff:
Store Chain, Inc.
Defendant:
Melissa Gilbert and Seth Matkowsky
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Perkins v. Yakomatos et al
as 3:2019cv00711
Defendant:
Dr. John Yakomatos, Melissa Gilbert, William Welch and others
Plaintiff:
John William Perkins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
STEWART-BEY v. MCDONALD et al
as 2:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEWART-BEY
Defendant:
MELISSA GILBERT, KEITH MCDONALD, RICHARD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Silva v. Jeffrey Uttecht, et al
as 16-35683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW G. SILVA
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden, DAVID P. BAILEY, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center Associate Superintendent, SCANLON, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center Hearings Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Silva v. Uttecht et al
as 4:2015cv05094
Defendant:
Jeffrey A Uttecht , David P Bailey , Scanlon and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew G Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ADDERSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2012cv00395
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ADDERSON , KELVIS BRITT , DEANNA ALLEN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Gilbert et al v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joe Gilbert and Melissa Gilbert
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
