Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MCGILL v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Griffin v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Melissa Griffin
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Griffin et al v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
James Griffin , Melissa Griffin and J & M Contracting, LLC
Defendant:
Verizon Communications, Inc. and Go Wireless, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GRIFFIN v. CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, LP
as 1:2012cv00721
Defendant:
CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, LP
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GRIFFIN v. ICUL SERVICES CORPORATION, D/B/A CREDIT UNION CARD CENTER
as 1:2012cv00548
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GRIFFIN
Defendant:
ICUL SERVICES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GRIFFIN v. RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT
as 1:2012cv00544
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GRIFFIN
Defendant:
RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. v. Griffin
as 4:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Melissa Griffin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
