Cases 41 - 50 of 74
US v. David Michael Hodge
as 14-4442
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL HODGES
Dillon et al v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2014cv00820
Defendant:
Clackamas County and Craig Roberts
Plaintiff:
William Dillon, Scott Vincent Graue and David Michael Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HODGE v. BULL CITY FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2013cv01151
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HODGE
Defendant:
BULL CITY FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hodges v. Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv01756
Plaintiff:
Gordon Michael Hodges
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries North America, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc. and Ryobi Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodges et al v. All Transit, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02587
Defendant:
All Transit, LLC and Daniel Liebowitz
Plaintiff:
Zelmo Brooks II, Michael Hodges, Sasha Oyewoleturner and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hodges v. Jamaludean et al
as 3:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Hodges
Defendant:
Jamaludean, Ken Stolle and P. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv00206
Plaintiff:
Gwen Hodge and Michael Hodge
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Lancia (Petro)
as 12-3264
Defendant:
David Kinney, Michael Russo, Melissa Valentin and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Stacey Petro
Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
United States of America
Hodges v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02695
Plaintiff:
Michael Hodges
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and DOES 1-10 inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
