Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv09715
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JACKSON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00509
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JACKSON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
JACKSON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACKSON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J. SAWTELLE and DON MAURAINEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Found et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Defendant:
Debra Found, Michael Jackson, Captain Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Jackson v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15633
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM MICHAEL JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Jackson v. Hooper
as 23-30097
Petitioner / Appellant:
Troy Michael Jackson
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Jackson v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Michael Jackson
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Cleveland County Det. Centers Administrators et al
as 5:2022cv01038
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
Cleveland County Det. Centers Administrators, TurnKey Health Administrators and Becky Pata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Buffaloe Jr. et al
as 5:2022ct03285
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
Eddie Buffaloe Jr., Roy Cooper, Division of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
