Cases 21 - 30 of 13,607
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan Dyjak v. Grace Hou, et al
as 24-1816
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
GRACE HOU and LANA MILLER
Victor v. Harry et al
as 3:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
William Victor
Defendant:
Secretary Harry, Deputy Secretary Bickell, Deputy Secretary Wenorwicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. Miller
as 6:2024cv06291
Petitioner:
Marcus Mosby
Respondent:
Supt. Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wyner v. Dockery et al
as 4:2024cv04037
Plaintiff:
Phillip James Wyner
Defendant:
Sergeant Dockery, Sergeant Frazier, Lieutenant Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Haqq v. Stirling et al
as 2:2024cv02884
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gillespie v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert David Gillespie, Sr.
Defendant:
Lt. S. Young, Deputy Smith, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aurel v. Jessup Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Jessup Correctional Institution, Dr. Khalid El-Bedavei, MD, Dr. Muleta Obsu, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. Paramore et al
as 5:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Waiter H. Paramore, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Petty #283097 v. Horrocks et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gregory Petty #283097
Defendant:
Rebecca Horrocks, Chester Dums, Lance Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
