Cases 51 - 60 of 26,233
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Palmer v. Swedish Match North America, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60522
Plaintiff:
Kovadis Palmer
Defendant:
Swedish Match North America, LLC and Philip Morris International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morris v. Pathlight Property Management
as 1:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Shanita Morris
Defendant:
Pathlight Property Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Killian v. Morris et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sanford A. Killian
Defendant:
Susan W. Morris and Katrina Mooney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
Isbill v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6064
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WILLIAM ISBILL
Defendant:
KEVIN STITT, Governor, LARRY MORRIS, Pardon & parole Board member, ADAM LUCK, Pardon & parole Board member and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Dale Morris et al v. Ceridian HCM
as 5:2024cv00691
Petitioner:
DALE MORRIS and CERIDIAN HCM, INC. dba CERIDIAN DAYFORCE;
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
