Cases 1 - 10 of 3,221
John Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Porter Jr v. Commonwealth of MA District & Superior Court et al
as 4:2024cv40068
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Porter Jr
Defendant:
Commonwealth of MA District & Superior Court, Worcester Superior Court, Malden District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MCCRAE v. RUSH et al
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MCCRAE, III
Defendant:
TAMARA RUSH, WARDEN PARSON, JERNIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Victora Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. Clive Davis et al
as 2:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Clive Davis, Saviii 3rd, The Diamonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bronson v. Leduc
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
MSj. Mcp, QMHP Howard F Bronson
Defendant:
MA, LADC Greg Leduc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Dixon v. Taqueria LA 20 LLC, et al.
as 2:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Madeleine Dixon
Defendant:
Taqueria LA 20 LLC d/b/a MUCHO MAS and Shawn Toups
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
