Cases 1 - 10 of 93,056
Tuggle v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tuggle
Defendant:
Cord Williams, Christian L. Pyles, E Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seniuk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Mark Seniuk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McCown
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Mark McCown
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Kelly v. DCC Technologies Holdings, Inc.
as 24-1058
Not Yet Classified:
KEVIN KELLY, MARK WILKINS, DCC TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. and others
United States of America v. Echevarria (Heyward)
as 24-1060
Defendant:
TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA, JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jimenez v. United States Department of Transportation, et al.
as 24-2557
Plaintiff:
MARK JIMENEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ELAINE L. CHO, Hon. and PETE BUTTIGIEG
Robinson v. PNC Bank et al
as 1:2024cv01729
Defendant:
National Association (Inc.), PNC Bank and RBC Centura Bank, as Assignee
Plaintiff:
Mark Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mejia v. Marvelous Mark Transportation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Mejia
Defendant:
Marvelous Mark Transportation Co., Inc., CE Solutions Group, LLC and CE Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
