Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Hall v. The Nutro Company et al
as 4:2017cv00326
Plaintiff:
Maurice L Hall
Defendant:
The Nutro Company and Mars Petcare US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Mars Petcare Us, Inc. v. Petedge, Inc.,
as 1:2017cv10390
Plaintiff:
Mars Petcare Us, Inc
Defendant:
Petedge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Mars Petcare US, Inc. (PLR2)
as 3:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Randy Roberts
Defendant:
Mars Petcare US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv07001
Plaintiff:
Tamara Moore , Greta L. Ervin , Raff Arando and others
Defendant:
Mars Petcare US, Inc. , Nestle Purina Petcare Company , Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv07001
Defendant:
Mars Petcare US, Inc, Mars Petcare US, Inc., Nestle Purina Petcare Company and others
Plaintiff:
Moore, Tamara Moore, Greta L. Ervin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Mars, Incorporated et al v. The J.M. Smucker Company et al
as 1:2016cv01451
Plaintiff:
Mars, Incorporated and Mars Petcare US, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
The J.M. Smucker Company
Defendant:
Big Heart Pet, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
In Re Michael Wilson
as 2:2015mc00294
Defendant:
M and C USA LLC, Mark and Chappell Limited, TruRX LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mars Petcare US, Inc. and Mars, Inc.
In Re:
Subpoena to Michael Wilson
Movant:
Michael Wilson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Christina Wirth et al v. Mars Inc et al
as 8:2015cv01470
Defendant:
IAMS Company, Mars Inc, Mars Petcare US Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Wagner and Christina Wirth
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
