Cases 31 - 40 of 3,344
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Godbold v. Field et al
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Marshall Godbold
Defendant:
Newell B. Field and Patrick McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDowell v. Nebraska State Fire Marshals Office
as 4:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
John Harvey McDowell
Defendant:
Nebraska State Fire Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MALIK v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
KEITH SHAZAD MALIK
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FBI SPECIAL AGENT MARSHALS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. U.S. MARSHALLS
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robertson v. Robertson
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Belinda Robertson
Defendant:
Cale Robertson, Melanie Rhodes, Jill J Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strong v. Shelter Plus Care et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Zachary Strong
Defendant:
Shelter Plus Care, Mecklenburg County, Kenya Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Marshall v. Alameda Contra Costa Transit District et al
as 4:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Danny Marshall
Defendant:
Alameda Contra Costa Transit District, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 192 and Robert L. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Allen-Smith v. US Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen-Smith
Defendant:
US Marshall and FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
