Cases 71 - 80 of 470
Awawda v. Barr
as 19-367
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Ribhi A. Awawda, AKA Ribhi Awawdeh, AKA Rebhi Awawda, AKA Ribhi Abed Awawda, AKA Rihhi El Abed Awawdeh
Sean Wright v. Eric Schmitt, et al
as 19-1284
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric S. Schmitt, Missouri Attorney General, Matthew G. Whitaker, U.S. Attorney General and Jeff Norman, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sean T. Wright
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00709
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vilca-Acosta v. Barr
as 19-9509
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER and WILLIAM P. BARR
Petitioner:
GIANMARCO EVERTH VILCA-ACOSTA
Hussein v. Whitaker et al
as 0:2019cv00292
Defendant:
John Does, U.S. Department of Justice, Matthew G. Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Gamada A. Hussein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McQuillan v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00191
Defendant:
John H Durham, Commissioner Nancy Berryhill, Matthew G Whitaker and others
Claimant:
Tammy Lynn McQuillan
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tammy McQuillan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Medrano Cruz v. Barr
as 19-372
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gendris Fernando De Jes Medrano Cruz, AKA Henry Medrano, AKA Hernando Crudeta, AKA Fernando Cruseta
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00174
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hix v. Whitaker et al
as 6:2019cv00190
Defendant:
Ellen Rosenblum and Matthew G. Whitaker
Plaintiff:
Steven Randolph Hix, Jr.
Petitioner:
Rhonda T. Favero, Stanley Dawidowicz, Lawrence L. Favero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
