Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Taylor v. Hudgins
as 5:2019cv00291
Petitioner:
Matthew Taylor
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kortright Capital Partners LP v. Investcorp Investment Advisers
as 19-2836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Taylor, Kortright Capital Partners LP and Ty Popplewell
Defendant / Appellee:
Investcorp Investment Advisers Limited
Taylor v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv00051
Plaintiff:
Matthew Taylor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Keilbaugh v. Salt Lake City Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00017
Defendant:
FNU Burbank, Matthew Taylor, Salt Lake City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Heidi Keilbaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pannell et al v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2018cv00271
Plaintiff:
Nikesia Sharey Pannell and Choya Hassiba Johnson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Michael Gowder, Southern Concrete Specialties, Inc. and Matthew Taylor Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shotwell v. Sapp et al
as 1:2018cv00984
Defendant:
Captain Jason Sapp, Detective Gatti, Captain Pete Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Shotwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Shiomoto et al
as 3:2018cv02116
Plaintiff:
Matthew Taylor
Defendant:
Jean Shiomoto and Michael Bzdyra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Spain et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01308
Plaintiff:
Brandon Spain , Paris Williams , Marquis Stokes and others
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company , Janssen Research and Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Pembroke Pines Police Department
as 0:2016cv62956
Plaintiff:
Matthew Taylor
Defendant:
Pembroke Pines Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
