Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Scott v. Waterstraat et al
as 3:2022cv03116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Waterstraat, . Bowen, John Doe, 11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elam v. Overstreet et al
as 1:2022cv01398
Plaintiff:
Eric Jordan Elam and Ahuto Dakidd
Defendant:
Damion Overstreet, Jeffrey McAdams and Cherokee County District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elam v. Cherokee County Sheriff Office
as 1:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
Eric Elam
Defendant:
Cherokee County Sheriff Office, Sheriff Frank Reynolds and Correct Health Jeffrey McAdams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. NY Attorney General et al
as 2:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
Derwin Butler, Sr
Defendant:
NY Attorney General, La Orodgren Coranena, John Blount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bromark v. Centurion of Arizona LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00632
Defendant:
Valerie Gilreath, Stacey Elizabeth Stockton, Diana Curd and others
Plaintiff:
John Bromark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Saad et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Ian Connors, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greenup v. LeBlanc
as 5:2020cv00130
Defendant:
Scott Cottrell, Vincent Coleman, Jeffrey McAdams and others
Plaintiff:
Levi G Greenup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Nurse's Supervisor et al
as 9:2019cv03114
Defendant:
Ms. McAdams, Nurse's Supervisor, Classification Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Cecil Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCADAMS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2019cv17800
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JAMES MCADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sheppard, Charles v. Kool et al
as 3:2019cv00724
Defendant:
C/O Bliss, C/O Morris, Sgt. Broadbent and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Sheppard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
