Cases 71 - 80 of 726
United States of America v. Doe
as 22-3108
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Doe, AKA Sealed Defendant, AKA Jimmy Earl McNeill, AKA Michael Gerard Simpson
MCNEILL v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2022cv01044
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LAVON MCNEILL
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeill v. BJ Wholesale
as 1:2022cv03030
Plaintiff:
Cleo McNeill
Defendant:
BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Harrison v. Broch et al
as 2:2022cv02234
Plaintiff:
Lyle Roger Harrison
Defendant:
Richard L Broch, Jeremy R Richey, Cynthia J Braden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
US v. Demetrios McNeill
as 22-7226
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEMETRIOS DONELL MCNEILL
MCCOY v. MCNEILL et al
as 5:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SYLVESTER MCCOY, JR
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEILL, KRISTAIN SHAW, JOSHUA GWYN SEIGLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner-McNeill, Jr. v. Nur et al
as 3:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Anthony Turner-McNeill, Jr.
Defendant:
Hamze Dahir Nur and Kardan Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Emilien v. McNeill et al
as 6:2022cv03326
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Emilien
Defendant:
Chelsea B. McNeill and Matthew R. Ozment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McNeill v. American Summit Insurance Co
as 1:2022cv04063
Plaintiff:
SHARON MCNEILL
Defendant:
AMERICAN SUMMIT INSURANCE COMPANY and American Summit Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Henderson v. Sutherland et al
as 3:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Defendant:
Ashley Sutherland, Clerk Kate Morgan, Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
