Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Michael Collins v. J. Oats
as 24-6126
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LASHARN COLLINS
Defendant:
J. D. OATS, Assistant Warden, C. WASHINGTON, Inmate Program Manager and BERNARD MORRIS, Religious Advisor to the Faith Review Committee for Virginia DOC
COLLINS v. SMITH
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. COUSINS and MICHAEL S. COLLINS
Defendant:
MARK SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Valley et al
as 1:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Michael A Collins
Respondent:
Warden Valley, Sargent Barrows, Brad Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander Brown v. E Hernandez-Perez, et al
as 22-12517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER LEO BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, MICHAEL R. COLLINS and LUIS RODRIGUEZ
COLLINS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. COLLINS, SR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Jackson, Captain Tuck, Chief Deputy Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00118
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Party and Arizona Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Oats et al
as 1:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
Michael Lasharn Collins
Defendant:
J.D. Oats and C. Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLINS v. WARDEN
as 2:2020cv00541
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SB. COLLINS, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00364
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Collins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
