Cases 11 - 20 of 145
William Graven v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-16909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. GRAVEN, Named as Will
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General, MICHAEL BAILEY, for acts as Asst AG and Chief of Staff, DON CONRAD, for acts as Chief of the Criminal Division and others
BAILEY v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22628
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. Henderson Police Department, et al.
as 2:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Defendant:
City of Henderson, Nevada, Henderson Police Department, Thedrick Andres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kati Ackermann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04974
Plaintiff:
Kati Ackermann, Nicole Adkins, Angela Agosto and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ackermann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00767
Plaintiff:
Ackermann, Kati Ackermann, Nicole Adkins and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Ackermann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Kati Ackermann, Nicole Adkins, Angela Agosto and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bailey v. Mays
as 2:2022cv02343
Petitioner:
Michael Bailey
Respondent:
Tony Mays and Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAILEY et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY and PATTI BAILEY
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. v. Hultgren et al
as 3:2022cv00283
Counter Defendant:
Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Carl Hultgren, Michael Bailey and Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
