Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Robeson v. Harris
as 3:2022cv01564
Petitioner:
Corey Evan Robeson
Respondent:
Michael J Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
BENOIT v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00937
Petitioner:
RICHARD DANIEL BENOIT
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. HARRIS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jimenez v. Sacks Tierney PA et al
as 2:2018cv02506
Defendant:
Michael J Harris, Unknown Harris and Sacks Tierney PA
Plaintiff:
Liliana Jimenez and Liliana Chacon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harris v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00819
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Harris
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harris v. Hot Springs County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2016cv06129
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Harris
Defendant:
Corey Rickard, Hollingsworth and Michael Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01389
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Harris
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv24671
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Harris
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Buck et al
as 1:2013cv01127
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Harris
Defendant:
Guy Buck, Alan Strickland, Michelle Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Buck et al
as 3:2013cv00396
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Harris
Defendant:
Guy Buck, Alan Strickland, Michelle Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05671
Plaintiff:
Maureen M. Harris and Michael J. Harris
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
