Cases 1 - 10 of 199
SMITH v. PITMAN et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Defendant:
INDIANA HORSE RACING COMMISSION, ERIC SMITH, TOM LINKMEYER and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Morris v. Derosha et al
as 7:2024cv00858
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of State Police and Timothy R Derosha
Plaintiff:
Michael Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinton et al v. Puzio et al
as 3:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
Jonathan King, Dartre Booker, Dominique Butler and others
Defendant:
Puzio and Robert Greene, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Nix v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2024cv06318
Defendant:
Treasurer of Churchill Park, Vice President of Churchill Park, Catherine Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Nix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nolan et al v. D.P.S.C.S.
as 1:2024cv02838
Plaintiff:
Robert Sansbury, David Carlton, Juan Soto and others
Defendant:
D.P.S.C.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA et al v. DIAL et al
as 2:2024cv04548
Plaintiff:
WANDA IVALES GARCIA and EDDIE IRIZARRY
Defendant:
P/O MARK DIAL, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and P/O MICHAEL MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reyes v. Amherst-Pelham Reginal School District et al
as 3:2024cv30096
Defendant:
Douglas Slaughter, Michael Morris and Amherst-Pelham Reginal School District
Plaintiff:
Doreen Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Marchetti et al
as 1:2024cv05851
Plaintiff:
Johnny Taylor
Defendant:
Michael Morris, Connor Marchetti, Matthew Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
