Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Moreno-Bravo v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv00032
Petitioner:
Jaime Moreno-Bravo
Respondent:
Warden Michael Sutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SUTTON v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2012cv00512
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SUTTON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY M. MONTICELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hector Zuniga v. William Effler
as 12-6072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR EDGARDO RUIZ ZUNIGA
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM EFFLER, SHANE VARNEY, MICHAEL SUTTON and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH CRAVEN
Henderson Hinton v. Roy Cooper
as 12-6000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENDERSON L. HINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY COOPER, ROBIN PENDERGRAFT, PAT J. MATTHEWS and others
Sutton v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv03765
Plaintiff:
Michael Sutton
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Marilley v. McCamman et al
as 4:2011cv02418
Plaintiff:
Kevin Marilley
Defendant:
Jonh McCamman, Kevin Hunting, Donald Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Cooper et al
as 5:2011ct03039
Plaintiff:
Henderson Lewis Hinton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Robin Pendergraft, Pat J. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz Zuniga v. Craven et al
as 5:2009ct03177
Plaintiff:
Hector Edgardo Ruiz Zuniga
Defendant:
Joseph Craven, William Effler, Shane Varney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reece v. Sutton
as 1:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charlene Reece
Defendant:
Michael Sutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Austin v. Varner et al
as 4:2009cv01363
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Austin
Defendant:
Dorina Varner, James Michael Sutton, Kenneth R. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
