Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
SCHAEFER et al v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES et al
as 3:2026cv11403
Defendant: BRENNTAG SPECIALTIES, INC., AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES individually and as successor to Pinaud, Inc., Barbara Alice, Inc., Ed Pinaud, Inc. d/b/a Ed Pinaud, The Nestle-Le Mur Company, The Neslemur Company, The Neslemur-Company, for the Clubman line of products, BARRETTS MINERALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: RHONDA RAY SCHAEFER, DAWN MARI KING and SARAHSUE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
WESTOVER et al v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR CLUBMAN, et al.
as 3:2026cv11391
Defendant: BRENNTAG SPECIALTIES, INC., CHATTEM, INC., HIMMEL MANAGEMENT CO. LLC also known as HIMMEL GROUP formerly doing business as MARTIN HIMMEL, INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to BLOCK DRUG CORPORATION, successor-ininterest to BLOCK DRUG COMPANY, successor-in-interest to THE GOLD BO and others
Plaintiff: BARBARA WESTOVER and DARL WESTOVER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
LEON et al v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 3:2026cv11410
Plaintiff: ALDUHA IBRAHIM LEON and MARVIN R. FIELDS, DECEASED
Defendant: AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC., BARRETT MINERALS, INC., CHATTEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
PARVIN et al v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR CLUBMAN, et al. et al
as 3:2026cv11407
Plaintiff: JOHN G. PARVIN and JANICE E. PARVIN, DECEASED
Defendant: AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR CLUBMAN, et al., BARRETTS MINERALS, INC., BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Kopp v. American International Industries
as 2:2026cv05463
Plaintiff: Christine Kopp
Defendant: American International Industries Individually and as successor to Pinaud, Inc., Barbara Alice, Inc., Ed Pinaud, Inc. d/b/a Ed Pinaud, The Nestle-Le Mur Company, The Neslemur Company, The Neslemur-Company, for the Clubman line of products, Barrets Minerals, Inc., Brenntag North America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hicks v. Texarkana Arkansas Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2026cv04067
Plaintiff: Brian James Hicks
Defendant: Texarkana Arkansas Police Department, McJunckins, Wayne Easley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1001 MINERAL SPRINGS ROAD, MADISON, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
as 1:2026cv00888
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 1001 MINERAL SPRINGS ROAD, MADISON, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Debra Darrington, et al v. Missouri Department of Mental Health, et al
as 26-2702
Plaintiff: Debra Darrington, Next Friend for M.R., on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals, Eric Massey, Next Friend for K.M., on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals, Anita Tabb, Next Friend for M.T., on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals and others
Defendant: Missouri Department of Mental Health, Mina Charepoo, Dr., in their official capacity as member of the Missouri Mental Health Commission, Kishore Khot, Dr., in their official capacity as member of the Missouri Mental Health Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06078
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00202
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?