Cases 21 - 30 of 587
Moffett v. Carr et al
as 2:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Michael M Moffett
Defendant:
Kevin Carr and Sarah Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moffett v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
Gwen Moffett
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MILLER v. GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER STANDARDS COUNCIL, et al
as 4:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
NANCY B MILLER
Defendant:
GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER STANDARDS COUNCIL, OMOTAYO B ALLI, MOFFETT FLOURNOY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Saito v. Moffett et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Koichi Saito
Defendant:
Alexis Moffett, Charles Nunley, Robert Crown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02836
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Michael Moffett v. Michael Meisner
as 23-2178
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL M. MOFFETT
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL MEISNER
Moffett v. Noe
as 1:2023cv00218
Petitioner:
Keonte M. Moffett
Respondent:
Guy Noe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cole v. Ashtabula County et al
as 1:2023cv01093
Plaintiff:
Michael Cole
Defendant:
Ashtabula County, Ashtabula County Sheriff's Department, William Niemi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moffett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01593
Plaintiff:
Charles Moffett and Judy Moffett
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
MOFFETT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11917
Plaintiff:
MARK S MOFFETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
