Cases 1 - 10 of 4,942
Stetzel v. Stancil, et al
as 25-1077
Plaintiff:
PHILIP E. STETZEL
Defendant:
MOSES ANDRE STANCIL, SIOBHAN BURTLOW, JORDAN HARTLEY and others
Wilson v. Moses
as 3:2025cv00310
Plaintiff:
Clayton Wilson
Defendant:
Ndidi Moses
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Goodwin (PS) v. Weiser et al
as 1:2025cv00693
Petitioner:
Daniel R. Goodwin and Daniel Roger Goodwin
Respondent:
Phillip J. Weiser and Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Barnes v. Payne et al
as 2:2025cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cambrin Barnes
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyles v. Floyd et al
as 3:2025cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kendra Lyles
Defendant:
Mose Levon Floyd, Mary Ann McClure and Real Pro Management Sunstate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Churchwell v. Pacheco, et al
as 25-1071
Petitioner:
ISAIAH T. CHURCHWELL, AKA Isaiah T. Churchwell-Bey
Respondent:
PAUL PACHECO, CCCF Warden, ANDREW MOSES STANCIL, CDOC Executive Director, BARRY GOODRICH, CCCF Warden and others
Weathersbee v. Cheatum et al
as 9:2025cv01267
Plaintiff:
Kurtino Weathersbee
Defendant:
Captain Moses Cheatum, Nurse Gerri Gillespie and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2025cv00652
Petitioner:
Ronald Lewis
Respondent:
Moses Andre Stancil and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
