Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Siggers v. Hamp et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Reno Fenelli Siggers
Defendant:
K.C. Hamp, Sr., Jammie Lewis, Ms. Persundra Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Williams v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Williams, Sr
Defendant:
Ms. Kathy Davis, Mr. Wayne Rickman, Mr. David Bosserman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Hochul et al
as 7:2021cv10185
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jerome Gardner
Defendant:
Ms. Kathy Hochul, Dr. Carl J. Koeigsman, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shephard v. Unites States Secretary of Labor (TV2)
as 2:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Ms. Kathy Sue Shephard and Martin J Walsh
Plaintiff:
Kathy Sue Shephard
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CRAWFORD v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2021cv00855
Petitioner:
RONALD CRAWFORD
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MS. KATHY BRITTAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. City of Angleton Police Station et al
as 3:2020cv00363
Defendant:
City of Angleton Police Station, Brazoria County Texas Courthouse, Donna Brackenridge and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEDD v. Coleman et al
as 5:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Mr. Cox, Ms. Spears, Ms. Cross and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI ARTHUR FEDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01434
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
