Cases 11 - 20 of 3,302
Mullins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Patrick Mullins
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Aurelio v. Mullin, et al
as 24-1120
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JOSEPH AURELIO
Defendant:
LARA J. MULLIN, MARION ALISON ROCKER-TUOHY, JAY SUTHERLAND GRANT and others
Mullins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Everette Mullins and Michelle Mullins
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Mullins, J.D. v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Amed S. Mullins, J.D.
Defendant:
City of San Diego and Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
MULLINS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03509
Plaintiff:
SUSAN MULLINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterkin v. Mullin et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Anthony Peterkin
Defendant:
M. Mullin and M. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Navarro et al v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Grace Navarro and Chatham Mullins
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Navarro et al v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Grace Navarro and Chatham Mullins
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
