Cases 1 - 10 of 74,939
(PC)Smith v. Tuolumne County Jail et al
as 1:2025cv00359
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Tuolumne County Jail, Tuolumne County DA, Tuolumne County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rampersad v. Tumasar et al
as 1:2025cv01669
Plaintiff:
Kissoon Rampersad
Defendant:
Michael N. Tumasar, Sharada Tumasar, Leona Somar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Shoemaker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00311
Plaintiff:
Brittany N. Shoemaker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
CORNISH v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv00336
Plaintiff:
CHRISTI N CORNISH
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, VIATRIS INC, GREENSTONE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Bradley County, Tennessee
as 1:2025cv00099
Plaintiff:
Mason N. Clemmer
Defendant:
Bradley County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holmes v. Coffey, MD et al
as 5:2025cv02784
Plaintiff:
Brian Marquis Holmes
Defendant:
Charles Coffey, MD, N. Marcillas, A. Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. General Atomics, et al.
as 25-1950
Plaintiff:
TERENCE D. DAVIS
Defendant:
GENERAL ATOMICS, GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC., N/L BLUE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
