Cases 1 - 10 of 947
Guevara v. Margoles et al
as 0:2024cv01482
Plaintiff:
Peter Michael Guevara
Defendant:
Michelle Margoles, Laura Provinzino, Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00525
Petitioner:
Anh Vu Nguyen
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Nguyen v. District Attorney Berks County, et al
as 24-1582
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI
Sanders #146274 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin Sanders
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Centurion of Arizona LLC, Ryan Thornell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lentz v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10198
Plaintiff:
Gary Lentz
Defendant:
MDOC, Heidi Washington, Aleksandra Wilanowski and others
Martell v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Leandre Martell
Defendant:
Well Path LLC, Kyle F Martineau, Ralph Aquino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00428
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 95-cr-10266-DPW
as 1:2023cv13152
Petitioner:
Minh Hung Nguyen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wright v. Lumpkin
as 23-11251
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dephne Nguyen Wright
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Janet Harry-Dobbins, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
