Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Polk v. Lacy et al
as 2:2026cv00148
Plaintiff:
Brandon Chrishon Polk
Defendant:
D Lacy, K Batchelor, A Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
as 3:2026cv12347
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES GERARD M. GREEN, COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carllynn NicholsIn re: Carllynn Nichols
as 26-306
Petitioner:
In re: CARLLYNN NICHOLS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Borjian v. Freese and Nichols, Inc.
as 1:2026cv03079
Plaintiff:
Soheyl Borjian
Defendant:
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Powell v. United States of America et al
as 6:2026cv00262
Plaintiff:
Juwan Powell
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr. Christopher Warren Stumbo, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Lee v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, et al.
as 26-6040
Plaintiff:
SUMOYYAH LEE, Individually and as successor-in-interest
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, BRANDON T. NICHOLS, Director of DCFS and others
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2026cv00573
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Monroe Nichols, Mike Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nichols v. Commissioner SSA
as 5:2026cv10350
Plaintiff:
Raul Eric Nichols
Defendant:
Commissioner SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
