Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Vidrio Fuentes v. Nurse Kelly et al
as 9:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Juan Felipe Vidrio Fuentes
Defendant:
Nurse Kelly and Captain Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosqueda v. Captain Hash et al
as 9:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jose Mosqueda
Defendant:
Captain Hash, Nurse Gabby, Nurse Kelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lee Stafford
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Jim Hammond, QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. NRADC et al
as 7:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Tyreik Dayshon Jackson
Defendant:
NRADC, Ofc. Dean, Nurse Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIBB v. LOOP et al
as 4:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
GEURIN D. BIBB
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP, SGT DANGLER, SGT GEARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazyck v. Medical Dept Well Path et al
as 5:2021cv03166
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Mazyck
Defendant:
Medical Dept Well Path, Hill Finklea Detention Center, Deanna Dingle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Reed et al
as 3:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Defendant:
Harold Reed, Holmes, Lt. Kevin Talley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Pfister et al
as 1:2021cv04962
Plaintiff:
Cameron Ingram
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Maurice Lake, Wendy Dybas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fritch v. Karas
as 5:2021cv05156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fritch
Defendant:
Doctor Robert Karas and Nurse Kelly Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00382
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc., Dr. Alfred Baldera, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Brendon Tyre Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
