Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Mazyck v. Medical Dept Well Path et al
as 5:2021cv03166
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Mazyck
Defendant:
Medical Dept Well Path, Hill Finklea Detention Center, Deanna Dingle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Reed et al
as 3:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Defendant:
Harold Reed, Holmes, Lt. Kevin Talley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Pfister et al
as 1:2021cv04962
Plaintiff:
Cameron Ingram
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Maurice Lake, Wendy Dybas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fritch v. Karas
as 5:2021cv05156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fritch
Defendant:
Doctor Robert Karas and Nurse Kelly Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meshell v. Prator et al
as 5:2021cv02347
Plaintiff:
Rachael Renee Meshell
Defendant:
Sheriff Steve Prator, Commander Bobby Wyche, Captain Rick Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00382
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc., Dr. Alfred Baldera, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Brendon Tyre Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNKIN v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00076
Defendant:
NURSE KELLY STEWART, SUPERINTENDANT ERIC TICE, MEDICAL DIRECTOR BRIAN HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. YOUNKIN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Frederick Banks v. Sekou Ma'at, et al
as 21-3038
Respondent / Appellee:
CORECIVIC, DAMON T. HININGER, CEO CoreCivic, DANA HIVNER and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS
Gentry v. Kelly et al
as 2:2020cv01912
Defendant:
Nurse Linda, L Carter and Nurse Kelly
Plaintiff:
Sidney Gentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 20-6454
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH COOPER, Psy. Dr./MHU Staff, SHANNON COLEMAN, MHU Staff, KEN BOWLIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
