Cases 1 - 10 of 13,129
Angelica et al v. Swanny Transportation Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv02177
Plaintiff:
Agudo Ortiz Angelica, Sanchez Alvarez Dariarly and Cabrera Juanazo Jennifer
Defendant:
Swanny Transportation Company, Inc. and Swanson Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Pagan v. Close et al
as 1:2025cv00682
Petitioner:
Carlos Ortiz Pagan
Respondent:
David Close and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv03410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv03435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv03341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv01948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Colson v. Mingo
as 25-890
Plaintiff:
RONALD COLSON
Defendant:
Warden MAXSOLAINE MINGO, MUNISH CHOPRA, ENJOLI MURRIA and others
Mojica Balaguera, et al. v. Bondi
as 25-2360
Petitioner:
JENNIFER ALEJANDRA MOJICA BALAGUERA and SHANTAL NAIHARA ORTIZ MOJICA
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ortiz et al v. American Strategic Insurance Corp.
as 8:2025cv00925
Plaintiff:
Mayra Berrios Ortiz and Roberto Rivera Ortiz
Defendant:
American Strategic Insurance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Javier Hernandez Ortiz v. Pamela Bondi
as 25-1379
Petitioner:
JAVIER HERNANDEZ ORTIZ
Respondent:
PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
