Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Hymon v. Rose, et al.
as 23-3659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK L. HYMON
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer ROSE, LVMPD - Dismissed #3 and GLEN O'BRIEN, District Attorney - Dismissed #3
Ward v. American Medical Response Ambulance et al
as 3:2023cv05402
Plaintiff:
Anjali Ward
Defendant:
American Medical Response Ambulance, Jessica Bruce, Officer Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hymon v. Officer Rose et al
as 2:2023cv01276
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
Officer Rose and Glen O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alucious Williams, Jr. v. Captain Gilbert
as 23-6028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALUCIOUS WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN GILBERT, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OSBORN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. CLIFTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MARSHALL v. LOMBARDO et al
as 1:2022cv04404
Plaintiff:
CAROLE MAE MARSHALL
Defendant:
WARDEN DONALD J LOMBARDO, CAPTAIN MAYQUIL, LT. CAMBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan Duboise v. Woods, et al
as 22-1773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN DUBOISE
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER WOODS, OFFICER THORNTON, OFFICER ROSE and others
Davis v. Henderson
as 22-20035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael William Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Rand Henderson, Magistrate Paul Damico, Officer Rose and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Burnett v. Wendy Lane, et al
as 21-2752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BURNETT and MICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
WENDY C. LANE, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, INSPECTOR MOYER, CORRECTIONS OFFICER CUELLAR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
